Trump administration weakens clean water protections

Los Angeles Times

WASHINGTON — Defying environmentalists and public health advocates, the Trump administration on Jan. 23 announced the replacement of Obama-era water protections with a significantly weaker set of regulations that lifts limits on how much pollution can be dumped into small streams and wetlands.

The changes to the Clean Water Act’s protections are expected to hit California and other Western states especially hard.

Federal data suggest 81 percent of streams in the Southwest would lose long-held protections, including tributaries to major waterways that millions of people rely on for drinking water.

Under the new rule, polluters will no longer need a permit to release contaminated water into so-called ephemeral streams — sometimes called washes or arroyos — where water flows only occasionally because of rainstorms and snowmelt. Wetlands that aren’t immediately adjacent to protected waters will also lose federal safeguards.

Both of these features are common in Western states, and scientists say they are likely to become more so as warming temperatures make a dry climate drier.

Clean water regulations are “essentially about how you provide drinking water. How you store flood waters. How you protect ecosystems that thrive in certain areas that we all need and want,” said Gina McCarthy, president of the nonpartisan Natural Resources Defense Council and a former EPA administrator under President Barack Obama, in an interview shortly before the rule’s unveiling. “This is a big deal issue, and I don’t think it was thoroughly looked at as it should have.”

In a rebuke to the Trump administration, the EPA’s own advisory board criticized the agency’s plans.

“These changes are proposed without a fully supportable scientific basis, while potentially introducing substantial new risks to human and environmental health,” the board wrote in its commentary.

In California, 2 out of 3 of the state’s freshwater streams could lose federal protection.

Yet the state is better positioned than others to weather the changes. Waters that lose protection under the Trump rule will still be covered under California law. And state regulators have strengthened protections for wetlands and streams in anticipation of the federal rollback.

Most states don’t have nearly enough money or environmental expertise to fill the void created by vastly scaled-down federal regulations.

The new rule is likely to attract legal challenges. By limiting federal jurisdiction over small streams and wetlands, it not only unravels the Obama administration’s enhanced protections — it strips away safeguards put in place in the 1990s under President George H.W. Bush.

Plans to narrow the Clean Water Act’s reach have been in the works since the earliest days of the Trump administration when the president issued an order directing the rollback of the 2015 rule, known as Waters of the United States, enacted by his predecessor.

That rule expanded the reach of federal regulations and further restricted farmers’ ability to use pesticides and fertilizers on land that could drain into wetlands and streams.

Real estate developers, farmers, ranchers and others fought for years against the Obama-era regulations.

Homebuilders complained that the rules needlessly limited where they could build. Farmers complained that the rules amounted to illegal infringements on their property rights that required them to get costly permits in order to dig a ditch. Mining and oil and gas companies joined the attack.

Environmental advocates countered that the federal government had an obligation to protect entire ecosystems, including ephemeral waters, to prevent downstream pollution.

Trump’s EPA and the Army Corps of Engineers repealed the Obama-era expansions last year at the behest of industry groups. The move met immediate legal resistance from environmentalists and several states, including California, which sued in federal court to have the regulations reinstated.

The replacement rule is scheduled to take effect 60 days after it is published in the Federal Register although expected lawsuits could delay its implementation.

In a statement, California Attorney General Xavier Becerra called the new rule “an unlawful assault on the Clean Water Act.” He added, “We’re prepared to take action.”

Earlier in January, Trump touted the rollback as a win for farmers.

Speaking to an audience of farmers and ranchers on Sunday at the American Farm Bureau Federation conference in Austin, Texas, Trump repeated an inaccurate claim that regulations enacted under Obama extended the Clean Water Act’s protections to puddles. It did not.

“Sometimes, you’d have a puddle — a little puddle. And they’d consider that a lake,” he said. “As long as I’m president, government will never micromanage America’s farmers.”

The rollback is the latest step in a decadeslong battle over the federal government’s authority to impose environmental protections on rivers, streams, wetlands and irrigation ditches.

Author: ANNA M. PHILLIPS

Share This Post On

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Website by NNE-digital - 2018 Greenfield Recorder - Privacy Policy - Copyright